4 ms·
Here's the thing though. The reason there is even a debate about this is because the agencies serve a legitimate purpose that allows this to confuse our sense o
by SapphireSun 11y ago
Here's the thing though. The reason there is even a debate about this is because the agencies serve a legitimate purpose that allows this to confuse our sense of morality. Without that rider, these methods would be roundly condemned in any other organization. A programmer working on unjustifiable programs should feel gross when they do something immoral.
Let's be clear here. This is the first time in the history of the world that nearly all ordinary communications by ordinary citizens, globally, are aggressively being monitored. The impact hasn't yet been fully felt by the global populace, but the power of these tools to rig the system and suppress dissent is very large and there is currently no effective check on these powers that is subject to public scrutiny.
- cm2187 11y agoWithout reaching the Godwin point, actually it is not. The Soviet Union or East Germany were spying on their citizens on a similar scale, at least in respect of the technology available at that time.