2 ms·
San Fransisco is no where near the top when you measure population density, other cities can fit more people in less space, San Francisco is not unique, it simp
by noyounoyounoyou 11y ago
San Fransisco is no where near the top when you measure population density, other cities can fit more people in less space, San Francisco is not unique, it simply represents the failure of local laws.
Also, what's with constant 'gub' slurs, are people on HN little children who must insult people who are willing to criticize inept policy makers?
- bsder 11y ago> San Fransisco is no where near the top when you measure population density, other cities can fit more people in less space, San Francisco is not unique, it simply represents the failure of local laws. Actually, you are factually wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_population_density https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_b... San Francisco is only behind New York, Los Angeles, and Miami in density. It's probably in or close to the top 20 in Europe. Sure, none of our cities compares to anything in Asia. We also don't seem to like to live that dense. > Also, what's with constant 'gub' slurs, are people on HN little children who must insult people who are willing to criticize inept policy makers? Invoking a lack of regulations as proof of success when the factual metrics (Houston's population density is ridiculously, laughably low) easily refute said statement is going to provoke a response appropriate for someone who clearly is impervious to fact.