4 ms·

What a colossal waste of resources.

• themodelplumber 11y ago
  What makes you say that? In the case of the I-90 project in the linked video, they addressed issues of risk and cost, as well as proof of use by animals, in the planning stage.
• andreasklinger 11y ago
  i wonder on a grand scheme of things if this is really a waste/spend of resources that actually matters. if people in 200 years from now look at our century's (or even generation) expenses - would they even see those kind of expenses anywhere? on the flip side: balance in nature is something we have still a very hard time recreating. reversing extinction is close to impossible. and imbalance of nature is potentially one of the biggest cost drivers for future generations. i see this as cheap R&D for future investments in the balance of nature 100 years from now.
• cjensen 11y ago
  The problem is that Canada chose to route their largest national highway, Trans-Canada Highway 1, right through a National Park. This is just mitigating the downsides of that decision.
  • refurb 11y ago
    I'm thinking the national park came after the roadway? Or at least the railroad? It's not like someone said "Hey, that's a nice national park, let's run a road right through it."