I am not making any claims, however. I am not claiming the opposite approach (closed source?) is the best. I am simply ensuring that most software I write is av

I am not making any claims, however. I am not claiming the opposite approach (closed source?) is the best. I am simply ensuring that most software I write is available for everyone, period. It could be used in a GPL project, a closed source project, or a BSD project. I am not even advocating a license position. My only goal is to help society by lessoning the work required by others, since they can freely use my code. A license like the MIT license maximizes that goal as far as I can see. I am content with admitting that I do not know the "best" model. And I am not opposed to releasing work under other licenses at other times. I have even released under the GPL in the past, but for political reasons. If you think I am a license warrior, you are incorrect.