3 ms·
You have to limit what are you going to learn, otherwise you will have no time to build anything. So you have to pick carefully. Generally, the open technologi
by vetinari 11y ago
You have to limit what are you going to learn, otherwise you will have no time to build anything. So you have to pick carefully.
Generally, the open technologies were proved to be useful in long-term, and even when they change, they change evolutionary. You don't have big bumps and complete u-turns in your progress.
There is also no-one, who suddenly decides that the technology you were invested into is suddenly not profitable for them and ceases development. The open source technologies die only then, when they are not useful to anyone.
So basically, strong preference for open technologies is a pragmatic risk mitigation and investment protection.
- incepted 11y agoHello German friend, > So basically, strong preference for open technologies is a pragmatic risk mitigation and investment protection. .net and Microsoft technologies completely invalidate that claim, don't you think?
- thawkins 11y agoNope, i wont touch them either for the same reason. Although ms is starting to get its act together and open sourcing parts of its ecosystem. Anyway who would write a net application on windows, they would need thier head seeing to.