3 ms·
"Please god somebody build tools that take advantage of that." Like, an IDE?
by carterehsmith 11y ago
"Please god somebody build tools that take advantage of that."
Like, an IDE?
- wpietri 11y agoAn IDE's a good start. But IDEs tend towards monolithic, which can mean relatively low adoption. I'd much rather see independent tools that can be plugged into IDEs. E.g., in this case, I'd rather that the type checker ran as a daemon. In its base mode, it would just produce text output. But it would also have some IDE-friendly protocol so that it could be easily bundled.
- carterehsmith 11y agoYeah some tools are kind of like what you describe... for example, FindBugs is a great lint-type tool for Java, that you can run standalone from command line (ie as a part of a build, or CI), but also has plugins for all major Java IDEs. I have it set to run every time I save a file (on that file only) and here is a kick, it does not run the command-line version, it just runs within the IDE so it is fast enough to be imperceptible.
- acconsta 11y agoDo any IDEs support large (million+ LOC) code bases?
- carterehsmith 11y agoI guess they do? Eclipse itself is many millions of lines of code, and far as I can tell, it seems that the prescribed way to develop for it, is to use Eclipse itself. I mean, if you search for a string, Eclipse comes back quick because it indexed all your files. Run a grep? It comes back 6X slower (on my adhoc test)