7 ms·
>In September 2013 we blogged about why we’re supporting Typed Clojure, and you should too! I wonder how many other premature "you should too"s have been issue
by j_m_b 11y ago
>In September 2013 we blogged about why we’re supporting Typed Clojure, and you should too!
I wonder how many other premature "you should too"s have been issued over the years. At least they had the guts to retract theirs.
- shadowcat 11y ago"You should support this" is not the same as "we're using this". Typed Clojure was a neat research project (disclaimer: I supported it) but it seemed not to work for their actual needs. Even though I no longer use Clojure much and prefer to work in languages designed for static typing (e.g. Haskell) I don't regret my donation. It is an ambitious project and I'm glad someone had the courage to take it on.
- pbiggar 11y agoI wrote that post, and it was very much about why you should support Typed Clojure, not why you should use it. You should support it for the potential, you should decide whether to use it on practical concerns.