4 ms·
This is too vague to judge. Does the AI code in self driving car apply? Or the control software in a drone? And in the future, ECU may not be a standalone dev
by azurezyq 11y ago
This is too vague to judge.
Does the AI code in self driving car apply? Or the control software in a drone?
And in the future, ECU may not be a standalone device any more.
- phire 11y agoYes. Any code which has a safety responsibility should have it's code publicly available. You could divide the cars systems up into safety critical and non-safety critical components, like there is no reason why the software running the car's media center needs to publicly available, but there should be a well defined interface between the media center and safety critical code (or no interface at all)
- floor__ 11y agoSo you want software regulations on how code ought to be done? Forcing the separation of components based on safety... what even warrants a component to fall under these regulations. Such a dangerous slope. Just think of a time when regulation is at its peak and people want to innovate but can't due to law restrictions / regulations. Being trapped by standards that are produced by people who know nothing about software.