This article to me is a perfect example of bias in the media. It takes something commonplace and reasonable and explains it in a way that makes it sound vaguel

This article to me is a perfect example of bias in the media. It takes something commonplace and reasonable and explains it in a way that makes it sound vaguely nefarious. Why ? Because many NYTimes readers already have a vague anti business bias, is the only explanation I can think of. Or is it just clickbait tactics ?