I just have to take issue with his claim about privacy being a luxury good: In this world, privacy becomes a luxury good. Mark Zuckerberg buys the four ho

I just have to take issue with his claim about privacy being a luxury good: In this world, privacy becomes a luxury good. Mark Zuckerberg buys the four houses around his house in Palo Alto, to keep hidden what the rest of us must share with him. What nonsense! The neighbors still live there and pay him instead of a bank. He did it to prevent a developer from forcing him to move, essentially. And no one forces us to give our data to him. Don't abuse language. Only the state can legally use force, and they often do it illegally as well. I don't exactly have warm and fuzzies about Mark, but there's enough truthful appalling material out there to support your claims about the lack of privacy.