>Sometimes I get a sense that many Haskellers treat hardware as merely implementation details. This is the ideal. The pinnacle of abstraction that HL languages

>Sometimes I get a sense that many Haskellers treat hardware as merely implementation details. This is the ideal. The pinnacle of abstraction that HL languages strive for. When you (inevitably) need to think about hardware in a extremely complicated system it means you hit a design flaw in the abstraction. What a lot of haskellers don't realize is that laziness can be one aspect of this flaw.