3 ms·
It's useless to "serve ads that have something to do with the stuff I'm looking at". I read an article about smart thermostats the other day. I don't need a the
by jbob2000 11y ago
It's useless to "serve ads that have something to do with the stuff I'm looking at". I read an article about smart thermostats the other day. I don't need a thermostat, I rent a shitty apartment! My HVAC is wrapped into my rent, I don't even care how much it costs. I saw an ad for bleach laundry detergent on YouTube, which I would never use because I listen to punk rock and don't own white anything. I've pretty much stopped watching TV because all they show are make-up and tampon commercials.
The advertisers need trackers, otherwise they're just yelling into the void. It never used to be like this because people were pretty homogeneous. A few decades of globalization and multiculturalism have made us much more diverse, and an impossible target for generalized advertising.
I'm not defending them, just pointing out the challenges product-makers and advertisers face.
- joosters 11y agoI've pretty much stopped watching TV because all they show are make-up and tampon commercials. You base your TV viewing on the advertising?
- PeterWhittaker 11y agoHe's not alone: I cancelled cable a couple of years ago for two reasons, the cost (for little to no value), and the terrible UX of ad-funded viewing. Streamed shows with no ads, ah! Wonderful, good value, even at a higher price (Netflix, IMHO, is leaving money on the table).