2 ms·

I've found that, in the embedded world at least, the overhead this adds (in terms of flash/rom and ram) can be fatal. That said, there are some more implementat

• deathanatos 11y ago
  > the overhead this adds (in terms of flash/rom and ram) can be fatal. I know you list the resources, but how does this approach add overhead? (how does it use those resources more than a "C" approach would?) Most of the constructs in C++ only cost anything if you use them, so you only pay if you need the feature; further, the runtime costs of most C++ features are pretty much exactly what's required for that feature… so if you were writing C, and you needed the same functionality, how would you avoid paying the same cost?