2 ms·
So you don't know what's in the standard, but you make assertions and continue to support them? That's a fairly disappointing level of discourse for HN. It requ
by dsuth 11y ago
So you don't know what's in the standard, but you make assertions and continue to support them? That's a fairly disappointing level of discourse for HN. It requires a very similar software development process to all other functional safety standards, in which verification and validation are key steps.
Here is a paper from Mathworks describing verification and validation according to ISO 26262:
http://www.mathworks.com/tagteam/71300_1D-4.pdf http://www.mathworks.com/tagteam/71300_1D-4.pdf
- hvidgaard 11y agoI know how ISO standards are implemented in two unrelated fields, that was really the basis for my comment. Besides, I am now certain that it does not require formal verification, as several companies sell products that support formal verification as a mean to pass the verification part of the ISO. I'm not going to pay for access to the standard just for a comment on HN. When you say European manufactures are required to follow this, what about non European manufactures?