Of course it is a personally matter- and I thought I made that clear. You view it as amoral, but the "animal rights" activists view it as immoral, so my argumen

Of course it is a personally matter- and I thought I made that clear. You view it as amoral, but the "animal rights" activists view it as immoral, so my argument is that if it is immoral, how is breeding fish, a life, to have certain genes which make it profitable to sell any more moral than cutting up an animal for education. I view that as hypocrisy which I view as disgusting. (Maybe doesn't apply to you) Secondly- I'm shocked I got down voted for expressing a negative opinion. I doubt I would have been down voted if my opinion was positive. But no matter. It wont stop me from saying my mind.