3 ms·
Yes, I'll publish the data soon. I've planned to do that before the talk at pgconf.eu (end of October in Vienna) where I'll talk about the results. But given th
by pgaddict 11y ago
Yes, I'll publish the data soon. I've planned to do that before the talk at pgconf.eu (end of October in Vienna) where I'll talk about the results. But given the current interest, I'll probably do that sooner, given the interest.
I've used kernel 4.0 because that's what was latest in May when I started with the benchmark - it takes ~3-4 days to test a single configuration and you can't simply change the kernel halfway through.
Also, as pointed out by semi-extrinsic, if you have to use bleeding-edge kernel, it probably is not mature enough for general use.
FWIW, I haven't really expected the rant to get discussed on linux-btrfs, but I'm nicely surprised by how polite and factual the posts are. They got most of the facts right and the inaccuracies are mostly minor and probably a consequence of the rant not providing all the data.
- simoncion 11y ago> ...it takes ~3-4 days to test a single configuration and you can't simply change the kernel halfway through. No worries! I've done very-long-running testing before. Moreover, your blog post made it very clear that you're not some n00b with an axe to grind. :) I wonder if it'll take substantially longer than 3->4 days for my systems to complete a test. Guess I'll find out within a few months! :D :D :D > ...I'm nicely surprised by how polite and factual the posts are. Yeah, the btrfs devs strike me as a really nice bunch of folks. Anyway, thanks for the info and the comment! :D