3 ms·
Cutting up a goldfish or breeding in transparency are amoral. Whether you find it disgusting or not is a personal matter. Unless of course I wanted to sell you
by glymor 17y ago
Cutting up a goldfish or breeding in transparency are amoral. Whether you find it disgusting or not is a personal matter.
Unless of course I wanted to sell you something. At which point it would take prime importance, as it clearly did to these scientists.
(If they made a goldfish that glowed (like a night light) they would also have me in their market.)
- wallflower 17y ago"Prolume" is a biotechnology company whose core business is based upon newly discovered genes from deep water marine bioluminescent organisms. This has broad applications for biomedical research, drug discovery, and entertainment. http://prolume.com http://prolume.com Not glowing goldfish but their BioToy division has some wickedly-cool science gifts.
- dbz 17y agoOf course it is a personally matter- and I thought I made that clear. You view it as amoral, but the "animal rights" activists view it as immoral, so my argument is that if it is immoral, how is breeding fish, a life, to have certain genes which make it profitable to sell any more moral than cutting up an animal for education. I view that as hypocrisy which I view as disgusting. (Maybe doesn't apply to you) Secondly- I'm shocked I got down voted for expressing a negative opinion. I doubt I would have been down voted if my opinion was positive. But no matter. It wont stop me from saying my mind.