11 ms·
Article doesn't sound like it's blaming Clinton, as much as pointing out that the spotlight on the issue is causing markets to expect additional interference an
by sologoub 11y ago
Article doesn't sound like it's blaming Clinton, as much as pointing out that the spotlight on the issue is causing markets to expect additional interference and thus lower returns. It's an emotional response.
- runesoerensen 11y agoResponding to increasing regulatory risks doesn't seem like a particularly emotional response.
- sologoub 11y agoThey are responding to a chance of additional regulation from a political candidate that hasn't been elected yet. To me that's fear and fear is an emotion.