I definitely understand where you're coming from. And to clarify, I definitely do not want a system where anyone dies from a disease that could be treated. Th

I definitely understand where you're coming from. And to clarify, I definitely do not want a system where anyone dies from a disease that could be treated. The argument about pricing really is separate from any argument about how the high prices can be paid for (state vs personal). For example, state funded insurance could cover the cost of expensive treatments. The question is really a macro one as much as a micro one. What percent of our resources should we spend on healthcare? That question is simply a sum of all the prices paid. I actually think that it's possible that in much of the developed world, economies may not be spending enough on healthcare, due to state intervention. Like much of the developed world, I already have a car, a TV, a computer, enough food, leisure activities, and live a comfortable life. Why would I not spend any of my truly expendable income to live a long and healthy life?