3 ms·
> A government can be held accountable. Accountability is not really the main measure we care about (though it's related to it). It's efficiency. We only reall
by randyrand 11y ago
> A government can be held accountable.
Accountability is not really the main measure we care about (though it's related to it). It's efficiency. We only really care about accountability because its supposed to increase efficiency. People are supposed to get punished when things are running poorly.
The problem is, no one really gets punished when large government organizations are running inefficiently. The business does not go out of business. There is no competition. There is no real incentive to innovate and beat your competitors.
I think we need to reevaluate pharma law. But I don't think replacing the current monopoly with a government one will do much good of anything.
I've long held the belief that whenever there is a supposed failing of private enterprise- it's almost always actually a failing of government. I've yet to be proved wrong. Government makes the barriers of entry too high in the drug market. It's way too easy to have a monopoly because the government basically grants you one.
- toomuchtodo 11y agoI am willing to trade some efficiency/cost effectiveness for price and availability stability.
- randyrand 11y agoIn the longer term you'll get the worst of all worlds. Why not get the best of the short term and long term? Fix pharma competition.