3 ms·
Even with such innovation, it would never match the iPhone touchscreen and I don't think Apple is willing to compromise like that. If Apple do think in this dir
by quan 17y ago
Even with such innovation, it would never match the iPhone touchscreen and I don't think Apple is willing to compromise like that. If Apple do think in this direction, I think it's more practical for them to have 2 equal size screens, an iPhone-like touchscreen for videos, games, and dynamic web browsing and an e-ink screen for reading books, magazine, and static web contents. The touchscreen can be used to control and navigate the e-ink screen (think of your laptop monitor being the eink screen and the keyboard being the touchscreen). It can be folded in like a laptop to protect the 2 screens or fold out (with both screens on the outside) when in used.
Now that is one way Apple will convince me to drop updwards of $600 despite owning a Macbook, iPhone, and a Kindle.
- city41 17y agoTwo equal size screens is not Apple though. They are all about simplicity and being directly obvious. They've even managed to work it so their laptops just have one big surface for a trackpad. They never even released a mouse that had two physical buttons.
- extension 17y agoIt might work if they can sandwhich the two screens together, so it just looks like one screen that changes modes.