4 ms·
Not sure how you get that reading... the author makes no claim that Spring is limited to XML configuration. In fact, in the paragraph just before the one you qu
by 6502nerdface 11y ago
Not sure how you get that reading... the author makes no claim that Spring is limited to XML configuration. In fact, in the paragraph just before the one you quote:
> It [the Spring framework] has a either code-based wiring or XML configuration-based wiring.
- fizwhiz 11y agoI read the paragraphs a little like "Spring has code-based config and xml-based config (careful with the xml-based config!) Guice and Dagger don't have xml-based config, so use Guice or Dagger". My gripe is with the hand-wavy treatment of why Guice/Dagger are better alternatives just because they don't have xml-based configs even though the author knows that people can use Spring exclusively without xml-based configs (this is why i said it was disingenuous)