3 ms·
Could also mean we could need to plant less trees than we thought. At the very least, the models have to be updated to use a number of trees an order of magnit
by rrss1122 11y ago
Could also mean we could need to plant less trees than we thought.
At the very least, the models have to be updated to use a number of trees an order of magnitude higher than we previously thought.
- imauld 11y agoNo. While there are more than we estimated that doesn't mean there are enough. A similar story was on the front page recently that reported that since humanity became "global" there has been a 47% reduction in the number of trees in the world.