3 ms·
Great point. People need to define which ads they are talking about during these sorts of arguments, as "ads" can be thought of as any sort of content that spre
by roymurdock 11y ago
Great point. People need to define which ads they are talking about during these sorts of arguments, as "ads" can be thought of as any sort of content that spreads information about a new product or idea as you point out.
- copsarebastards 11y agoI don't think it's a great point, I think it's a point that shows no understanding of context. This thread is about ad blockers. Ad blockers don't block blog posts, books, or any of the things he brought up. If you know what "ads" means here, it's not because people need to define what ads they are talking about, it's because you're not paying attention.
- SomeCallMeTim 11y agoAd blockers absolutely block the ads at the top and of Google searches, which I specifically sited as useful.
- copsarebastards 11y agoWell, I don't agree. I don't find those useful. If it's what I am searching for, it should be the top search result, otherwise I don't want to see it. And for the record, I would pay for a search engine without ads (probably DuckDuckGo).
- throwaway2048 11y agopuppies are basicly ads, you wouldnt brutally slaughter puppies would you????