3 ms·
>Admittedly '+' over '&' is either style or hard-core "the operation is different, therefore we need a different symbol choice The former more than the latter.
by Nadya 11y ago
>Admittedly '+' over '&' is either style or hard-core "the operation is different, therefore we need a different symbol choice
The former more than the latter. The operation is different therefore we need a different symbol choice - and & also makes as much sense stylistically as + does.
"string1" and "string2", when read, makes sense. & is different from the conditional && like piping | is different from the conditional or ||
>Your example worries me. Personally I would not design a language like that.
Neither would I, but I like to think it was part of "made in 10 days" that allowed it to stick around.
- dragonwriter 11y ago> "string1" and "string2", when read, makes sense. & is different from the conditional && like piping | is different from the conditional or || Of course, in languages where & and | are already in use for bitwise operations on ints (etc.), using & for string concatenation would be a different form of the same clash as using + is.