> Statistically by any measure, men are and always will be better leaders than women. Unfortunately for your argument, the science that is very helpfully linke

> Statistically by any measure, men are and always will be better leaders than women. Unfortunately for your argument, the science that is very helpfully linked in the article claims otherwise. You're welcome to counter it with other studies, but they're pretty solid. > This generalization has nothing to do with the fact that there are totally incompetent leaders regardless of their gender. they often rise based on their desire and windfall rather than skill or competence. This part, however, is very true, and I agree with it. The article describes how this is more useful to men than for women... and instead of simply stating "we need more females as managers!" we should find ways to better evaluate managers by rigorous, scientific standards.