4 ms·
What/Who is "@Ph.T." referring to in the linked discussion?
by dfc 11y ago
What/Who is "@Ph.T." referring to in the linked discussion?
- nickpsecurity 11y agoI'm not sure. Ph.T. apparently followed both the Schneier's blog discussions and QubesOS mailing list. We were discussing many methods of using separation kernels for desktops, security appliances, inline-media encryptors, VPN's, and more. Going through details for a year or two. At some point, Ph.T. saw all that and asked about it on the QubesOS mailing list only to get our claims and their location in a comment section dismissed. That prompted my reply to the mailing list and argument that followed. That there's 250,000+ people lurking there for good information was why I put much of my design info there instead of my own blog.
- dfc 11y agoI enjoy reading your comments here at HN. Would you care to provide a link to your blog? I understand if you would like to keep the personas disconnected.
- nickpsecurity 11y agoWhy thank you! :) Your profile was an amusing read, too, haha. I don't maintain a blog: post on high-profile one's like Schneier's instead to get good techniques out there to wide audience. Reference copies stay there due to host's integrity and good peer review with me keeping links to many. I've been pulling them into local copies gradually to turn into a web site which will be powered with medium assurance tech at a minimum (esp my blog/comment signature scheme). Practice what I preach & build on it sort of thing. For now, I email the .txt files with the links and what posts I've pulled to whoever is really interested. Send me an email at the address in my profile and I'll return a [substantial] subset of my designs/essays along with a sample framework for high security.