So, because one particular style of "scientific" building/housing management failed, your implication is that all others are doomed to repeat the same fate? IMO

So, because one particular style of "scientific" building/housing management failed, your implication is that all others are doomed to repeat the same fate? IMO there's a pretty big difference between your "example" and what the posted article is attempting to do. Or, if I'm off the mark, what is it exactly that you are trying to get at by posting this "previous attempt"?