> I probably won't get you to change your mind, just know you aren't sticking it to the man. You're sticking it to the little guy. And that is the exact reason

> I probably won't get you to change your mind, just know you aren't sticking it to the man. You're sticking it to the little guy. And that is the exact reason I noted there needs to be an alternative to "my site is ONLY supported by ads". Right now all of this is predicated on that assumption. I challenge that as being necessary, which is why I also noted the google effort which while great for google ads, does nothing for other ad networks. Hopefully that clarifies things as apparently you think I'm against supporting businesses despite my efforts in making that abundantly clear that I am not trying to deprive people of money for their content. I'm unable to right now provide support outside of viewing ads, and that isn't just my problem, its the content providers as well. Taking the easy way out and saying I am the issue with not wanting to view ads and not that all of the parties involved is not very convincing. I do not buy into it being a moral view, nor ethical for that matter.