> For example, Finnish is utterly genderless, but it has more declension cases for nouns than Latin had. That's consistent with simply making a tradeoff. So a

> For example, Finnish is utterly genderless, but it has more declension cases for nouns than Latin had. That's consistent with simply making a tradeoff. So a Roman could say: I don't understand why the Finns created more declension cases when they could have just used gender.