> But Aphyr never once uses the term "corrupted data", or the word "corrupted". If you're going to quote an article, it's important to be precise. As opposed t

> But Aphyr never once uses the term "corrupted data", or the word "corrupted". If you're going to quote an article, it's important to be precise. As opposed to "pedantic"? Here's a quote from the article: > The probability of data corruption scales with client concurrency, with the duration of transactions, and with the increased probability of intersecting working sets.