3 ms·

Yes, we think in text or, more accurately, a language. But only a small percentage of us can think in code, yet software businesses will continue to come online

Yes, we think in text or, more accurately, a language. But only a small percentage of us can think in code, yet software businesses will continue to come online at exponential momentum. Having visual, drag and drop components is more universally accessible. If computers actually began to understand how we think (and by "we" I mean including those of us who aren't engineers), then the future of innovation is open to everyone and that's ultimately the vision of Bubble.

sklogic 11y ago
> But only a small percentage of us can think in code We always think in code. A plan for a day is a code (and nobody ever use graphical diagrams for it). A cooking recipe is a code (plain text, never a diagram). A legal document is a code (I wish some of them were diagrams, but a plain and unobfuscated English would have been even better). Pretty much any form of communication is code. A one-dimensional sequence of words. Yes, the existing coding languages are crap, they are simply not abstract enough and not flexible enough. And this is what must be fixed. Representing the same broken abstractions, but this time in 2D diagrams, won't fix anything, or even make things worse. Been there already, with flow charts and all that.