8 ms·
Though I do agree with the general sentiment of your comment, I should point out that the maintainers of this project do address this issue in their FAQ[0]. [0
by Rifu 11y ago
Though I do agree with the general sentiment of your comment, I should point out that the maintainers of this project do address this issue in their FAQ[0].
[0] http://wamp.ws/faq/#naming http://wamp.ws/faq/#naming
- urda 11y ago> Because of this potential ambiguity, here is what we recommend for authors/implementors Potential ambiguity? It's nothing but ambiguity! What were they thinking.
- degenerate 11y agoWow. You can't just... use the same acronym and assume everything is hunky dory because you pronounce it differently. It's still the same damn letters! This project should have gone with "WebMP" or the full WAMPWS acronym. By "stealing" an existing, long-running and popular acronym, the maintainers are going to stifle this project no matter how much they try to separate themselves from WAMP. Trick question: is it possible to run WAMP on WAMP?
- sumedh 11y agoYou know when you have to create a separate section just to explain your name that is the time you realize maybe this was not such a good idea.