4 ms·
HTTP 1.1: 2.0 s HTTP 2.0: 1.6 s Not very dramatic diffence. Location Europe, using 4G connection. HTTP 2.0 is surely nice for initial page load but for subseq
by Yaggo 11y ago
HTTP 1.1: 2.0 s
HTTP 2.0: 1.6 s
Not very dramatic diffence. Location Europe, using 4G connection.
HTTP 2.0 is surely nice for initial page load but for subsequent data loads I prefer websocket (in the context of SPAs).
- itsbits 11y ago"for subsequent data loads I prefer websocket" There is notable difference here. Developer needs to write code to implement server-push in Websockets but HTTP2 servers will do that for you by sending all dependancy files with a single request.