> It even says 'scripts used to control installation", not "scripts involved in installation" or anything like that. To be fair, one of the definitions of "con

> It even says 'scripts used to control installation", not "scripts involved in installation" or anything like that. To be fair, one of the definitions of "control" is to "determine the behavior or supervise the running of." So I think a fair case could be made that the software signing keys determine the behavior of the installation when their signatures decide whether or not a binary will be accepted by the hardware. You can say that they don't do much actual work, sure, but neither do real-world managers who merely sign off on projects and nobody disputes whether or not they "control" things. And I know I'm being really pedantic about the word meanings here, but I'm also pretty sure that arguments of the same form are regularly entertained by courts.