3 ms·
I don't understand that scenario — isn't message B the message thread 1 is waiting for? And to be fair, it does significantly reduce the risk of deadlock by av
by acconsta 11y ago
I don't understand that scenario — isn't message B the message thread 1 is waiting for?
And to be fair, it does significantly reduce the risk of deadlock by avoiding the complexity of explicit mutexes and condition variables.
- Gankro 11y agoA simple example of this would be two threads with two channels to each-other. A is in channel A, B is in channel B. While blocked on channel A, thread 1 can't handle messages in channel B. Certainly a bit more contrived then deadlock with locks, though (which you can easily do with even a single thread, even in Rust).