3 ms·
Yes. (IPFS author here) 1. Add a TXT record to DNS <domain> with: dnslink="/ipns/QmWGb7PZmLb1TwsMkE1b8jVK4LGceMYMsWaSmviSucWPGG" 2. should be able to use
by _prometheus 11y ago
Yes. (IPFS author here)
1. Add a TXT record to DNS <domain> with:
dnslink="/ipns/QmWGb7PZmLb1TwsMkE1b8jVK4LGceMYMsWaSmviSucWPGG"
2. should be able to use https://ipfs.io/ipns/<domain> https://ipfs.io/ipns/<domain>
See it in action here: https://ipfs.io/ipns/ipfs.io https://ipfs.io/ipns/ipfs.io
WARNING: IPNS is still under dev. it's not robust yet, convergence may not be perfect.
- RX14 11y agoAlso - if I remember correctly - if you visit ipfs.io with the Host header set to foo.com, it will return /ipns/foo.com.
- lgierth 11y agoYes exactly, the IPFS daemon running there looks at the Host: header and uses it to build an `/ipns/<the-header>` path which it will resolve and respond accordingly.
- chipsy 11y agoHow is "ownership" over a domain resolved?
- lgierth 11y agoJust classic DNS -- you set a TXT record on that domain, and IPFS uses standard DNS resolution to get the value of it.
- viraptor 11y agoIs there any place I can track IPNS completeness? I've seen issues / PRs / commits related to this, but just wondering if I can find a single-page/issue tracker.
- whyrusleeping 11y agoJust made an issue for this after seeing your comment: https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/1716 https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/1716 There should be some progress on ipns pretty soon, i'm working on a 'phase one' fix that improves upon the current situation, and will be replaced later by our final implementation once the specification and requirements for it are complete.