4 ms·
But the job is presumably not "being there from 9 to 5", it is to implement X. So why are you saying "they are not doing the job they are hired for"?
by facepalm 11y ago
But the job is presumably not "being there from 9 to 5", it is to implement X. So why are you saying "they are not doing the job they are hired for"?
- falcolas 11y agoI've yet to work at a job where my job was solely to "implement X". It is usually more along the lines of "apply 40 hours a week towards corporate goals." My team has a feature and bug backlog half a mile long; I could clone myself and still not run out of work. And even if I did manage to close out the backlog, there's more work which could be done towards company goals.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- bildung 11y ago> But the job is presumably not "being there from 9 to 5", it is to implement X. So why are you saying "they are not doing the job they are hired for"? Most probably because measuring employees by results and not by hours usually means working overtime, not leaving early. If an employer sees you leaving early while getting things done, why shouldn't she just give you more work?