3 ms·
I don't think it's been able to make up for the revenue they've lost in film for still cameras.
by jstevens85 17y ago
I don't think it's been able to make up for the revenue they've lost in film for still cameras.
- gaius 17y agoNot only that, but the revenue from printing (paper, chemicals, services) as most photos now never make it into prints. Having said that, the only proven way to store digital photos long-term is presently archival paper, so...
- borism 17y agoInteresting. Does Kodak have the best archival paper (and the tint) on the market?
- gaius 17y agoKodak and Fuji are about equivalent. You can print a digital image onto photo paper with a Frontier printer, and if you can keep it dry and out of direct sunlight it'll last a hundred years with no additional effort on your part. There's not yet a digital consumer media format that comes close to that.