>No effort is made to examine the trade-off between tackling tiny marginal problems vs. rethinking more fundamental assumptions and practices. So what? That i

>No effort is made to examine the trade-off between tackling tiny marginal problems vs. rethinking more fundamental assumptions and practices. So what? That isn't what the article and book is about. Maybe you should spend some time writing the book you seem to want to read, instead of criticizing a book for not including things, when you haven't even read it.