4 ms·
How often do we get 9.0 earthquake + tsunamis? I'm sure the earth and humanity would be much better off if every nuclear reactor was hit by one of these then th
by slacka 11y ago
How often do we get 9.0 earthquake + tsunamis? I'm sure the earth and humanity would be much better off if every nuclear reactor was hit by one of these then the catastrophic damage caused by global warming.
How many countries can afford to feed their population when their farmlands have turned to arid deserts and their coastal cities are all underwater? Just look at all the recent super storms and California's drought. Compare that to fukushima. And this is only the beginning. Global warming is the threat you should be worried about.
- p1mrx 11y ago> if every nuclear reactor was hit by one of these I don't know, if Iowa and Nebraska got hit by a 9.0 earthquake and tsunami, I would be pretty fucking terrified.
- slacka 11y agoha. To clarify my point. The end game of a runaway greenhouse effect is far more terrifying than thousands of nuclear accidents. Sure the local effects of a melt down are scary, but it takes the worst earthquake in the Japan's history to cause that kind of disaster on an obsolete, ancient reactor. Every generation of reactor get safer. Even if they weren't, we learn from every accident. Fukushima could have been prevented. In fact, Onagawa a nearly identical reactor under similar circumstances was spared by the heroic efforts of its operators.[1] [1] http://thebulletin.org/onagawa-japanese-nuclear-power-plant-didn%E2%80%99t-melt-down-311 http://thebulletin.org/onagawa-japanese-nuclear-power-plant-...