> I've seen authors literally balk at the suggestion that they shouldn't have full control over their creations for perpetuity, and upon further digging, their

> I've seen authors literally balk at the suggestion that they shouldn't have full control over their creations for perpetuity, and upon further digging, their point of view was that anything less is immoral, not just illegal. Their opinion is biased, of course they think that; they're wrong, but they're free to think that. Intellectual property is unnatural, allowing people to claim to own ideas forever is absurd.