3 ms·
This is something I've been wondering about. Do we know the extent to which this process truly is entirely automated, and not so much as glanced over by an actu
by pdabbadabba 11y ago
This is something I've been wondering about. Do we know the extent to which this process truly is entirely automated, and not so much as glanced over by an actual human? I would think that even a cursory human review of "infringements' flagged by a bot could satisfy the legal standard in this opinion, and would add little overall cost for the takedown mills.
- DanBC 11y agoRIAA sent 100,000 takedown requests to a single website. It's unlikely a human did much scrutiny of that. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/09/sharebeast-the-largest-us-based-filesharing-service-has-its-domain-seized/ http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/09/sharebeast-the-la... And there are sites that routinely get clearly bogus takedown requests. Google deleted 200million search results in 2013. https://torrentfreak.com/google-deleted-200-million-pirate-search-results-in-2013-131112/ https://torrentfreak.com/google-deleted-200-million-pirate-s...