3 ms·
> There are definitely protectionist aspects Do I read it correctly that you are arguing it is significantly less about protectionism and mostly about state ce
by steve19 11y ago
> There are definitely protectionist aspects
Do I read it correctly that you are arguing it is significantly less about protectionism and mostly about state censorship/control?
- rdl 11y agoNo. It's primarily about the market just being unique. We have maybe 10 people in the company who speak Chinese; trying to build a Chinese-language product alone would be challenging. The language portion is the smallest aspect to localizing a service like ours. The Chinese Internet has evolved differently -- for us to learn how it works on our own, even with full access, would take forever (5y maybe to where it is now, by which point it would have evolved -- would never catch up.) It's secondarily about regulation for its own sake -- governments regulate because they think they should, especially communications. Communications is one of the most highly regulated sectors of the economy around the world, even in countries which are relatively free market. It's tertiarily about protectionism. That might have been more true 5-10 years ago, but I'd be amazed if a non-Chinese company could go into the Chinese market directly and out-compete on services built by local companies. There are definitely products (high-end machine tools, luxury goods) where foreign companies are preferred, but Internet services aren't one of them. It's only minimally about censorship. If you're operating in a country, you're subject to their laws, which doesn't really matter if you're in a partnership vs. have your own servers in that country.
- steve19 11y ago@rdl Thanks for your reply. It is interesting to hear the perspective of someone dealing with a different sector of the China. For what I do (security/defense) everything is censored by the Great Firewall.