3 ms·
To me, Hitler threw WW2 - after overwhelming initial victories he, against the advice from generals, changed goals from strategic to vanity - London Blitz, Stal
by emp_zealoth 11y ago
To me, Hitler threw WW2 - after overwhelming initial victories he, against the advice from generals, changed goals from strategic to vanity - London Blitz, Stalingrad - took away Third Reich's lead and turned into militarily pointless endeavours.
While the bombings had some doctrines/ideas (even if flawed - The Bomber Will Always Get Through), stopping th steamroll of Red Army in the middle of nowhere, with looming winter was just suicidal. If Moscow fell, CCCP could have folded - the evacuated industry would not have a strong transport system to enable it, and, the Wehrmacht wouldn't freeze to death in the fields.
It's hard to retroactively explain it as a vision. It was megalomania.
- pron 11y agoWell, even if we accept Snyder's interpretation of Hitler's vision, I don't think it's right to expect every action to be a result of solely that vision. Even if we did, nobody said Hitler's strategy was ideal in achieving his vision. A visionary can be a bad strategist. My takeaway is that Hitler's vision may not have been one of German nationalism but of racial anarchy. Fascism is often associated with the desire to return to an imagined "golden age". But Hitler's golden age wasn't one of an imagined pure Germany, but of an imagined reality much further ago in the past, of people fighting like "pure" animals for racial superiority. I think that's a very interesting interpretation.