4 ms·
Well, it just went up by one. Their writing is really poor quality - as a person from outside of usa I kind of associated WashPost or NYT with the pinnacle of j
by emp_zealoth 11y ago
Well, it just went up by one.
Their writing is really poor quality - as a person from outside of usa I kind of associated WashPost or NYT with the pinnacle of journalism. Boy, was I wrong, when i started reading HN few years back, when I was ~20 i quickly started to think of those as trashy sensationalist junk. I was SHOCKED how bad it can be.
Heavily biased, always spinning a one sided story, poorly researched, ommission galore. Would visit an article every now and then, just to see what caused hundreds of HN comments, but less and less.
Oh well, freedom!
- DanBC 11y agoI'd be interested to know what you think are good sources? While they have bias it's obvious and predictable, and thus you can ignore it. They're very much better than most UK newspapers, which are the worst kind of scum.