4 ms·
No, it's consistent. It's a meaningless dog whistle like "socialism". Depending on your ideological perspective, anyone from a hardened Maoist to a Chicago scho
by vezzy-fnord 11y ago
No, it's consistent. It's a meaningless dog whistle like "socialism". Depending on your ideological perspective, anyone from a hardened Maoist to a Chicago school economist could qualify, or anything to do with state control whatsoever.
Therefore I'm really flipping your buzzword and using it against you. There are no HIGs for system software, and more often than not "This is user friendly." is a codeword for "I'm biased into thinking this way." It's not a criticism, it's a thought-terminating cliche.
If you have technical criticisms of djbware, that'd be fine. You evidently do not.
(That said, I do think it's generally accepted that system software disobeying you by making policy decisions you have not authorized is not admin-friendly. djbware excels at being mechanism only.)
- cwyers 11y agoWhere is it MY buzzword? You used it before I did, my first comment in this whole thread was a response to you.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agojoosters'. But you reiterated on it.
- cwyers 11y agoSo you cleverly decided to turn jooster's argument around on me because you couldn't tell the two of us apart?
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoSo, it's user-friendly for some hypothetical set of users that is not the set of users that currently exists. That is a reiteration. Either way, neither of us are saying anything of substance.