3 ms·
In this case, that would be "DH3" according to the article. Contradiction with no supporting evidence.
by kmcgivney 17y ago
In this case, that would be "DH3" according to the article. Contradiction with no supporting evidence.
- chrischen 17y agoSure, but you could probably argue that calling someone a "fag" without evidence is also DH3. But I think the nuance is that down voting is not explicitly stating a contradiction, only stating that you disagree (albeit anonymously), which is slightly more like DH0. So yea it technically is also DH3.