5 ms·
> The attitude from the Go community is almost like an anti-intellectual one isn't it? I hear you. There was a funny post a couple years ago weighing a bunch o
by commentzorro 11y ago
> The attitude from the Go community is almost like an anti-intellectual one isn't it?
I hear you. There was a funny post a couple years ago weighing a bunch of languages on republican/conservative vs. democrat/liberal scale. But the author erred with Go. Go is certainly the most republican conservative language out there today.
Go not only adopts the anti-intellectual stance but comes across as a language that's controlled by "religious leaders" who dictate not only the the direction of the language but its "morality" too. And those who use the language feel the same hidden pressures from constraints. This leads to a weird state of having to "believe" in a language and defending things: "like less is more", "choices are bad", and having others determining what you want and need.
And this is the most annoying part. Because Go is really not a bad language. It's simple and constrained but easy to get into and easy to get stuff done. But Go's the whole attitude comes across as somewhat off-putting to window shoppers who might actually purchase and be fine with it otherwise.
- djhworld 11y agoAnti-intellectual seems an off key remark to me, I'd say Go just takes a different school of thought. Intellectualism doesn't mean everything should follow one path.
- commentzorro 11y agoI don't think Go is anti-intellect as a language. I'm saying it's feature set makes it a definite choice to track an austere path. This seems to bring about a certain zeal and, especially for recent converts, a seeming need to proselytize. It's as if those new to Go need to convince themselves by saying out loud that they are, in fact, heading down a good and righteous road. I just haven't seen this sort of quasi faith-based argument coming from the other languages in the Algol tree.