4 ms·
For consistently high volume routes I could see it being superior to SDCs. You could move a lot of people out of a place with minimal waiting. It could also be
by waterlesscloud 11y ago
For consistently high volume routes I could see it being superior to SDCs. You could move a lot of people out of a place with minimal waiting.
It could also be part of a network, with transfers to and from SDCs, which could be arranged to be waiting per passenger at the terminal.
Say you have a major sporting event letting out. These could run from the stadium to smaller collection points for SDCs. Less congestion, less miles traveled for SDCs. Faster, too.
These could be the city-wide movement system, and SDCs the 'last mile', so to speak.
It's possible they're more efficient in maintenance and energy per passenger mile, as well.
- BurningFrog 11y agoSkyTrain looks like it has similar cost/benefit profile as subways. It leaves the surface traffic untouched and transports on a previously unused level. Building the tracks has to be considerably cheaper and faster than digging tunnels. Capacity is probably lower, but this should be able to travel on demand and 24/7. I also wonder if people will accept these car swooshing by their windows 24/7.